Speed up the research and compliance work that slows everything else down

Capabilities

Everything included, nothing bolted on after the fact.

Literature review and citation extraction
Structured data extraction from trials and reports
Regulatory submission drafting
Lab notebook and QA record reconciliation
Protocol and SOP search
Internal report and precedent search
Study documentation support
Compliance gap flagging

Every build starts with a fixed-scope conversation, no surprise line items after the fact.

The build itself, not a proof of concept.

01Literature and data extraction

An agent that reads papers, trial data and internal reports and extracts the structured data you need, cited back to source so nothing has to be taken on faith.

02Regulatory documentation

Drafts of regulatory submissions and reports assembled from your existing data and templates, ready for a scientist to review rather than compile from a blank page.

03Lab and trial data support

Lab notebook entries, trial logs and QA records structured and reconciled automatically, catching gaps before they become a finding.

04Internal knowledge access

Ask across your own protocols, past studies and internal reports in plain English and get a sourced answer instead of searching a shared drive.

FAQ

Can we trust the data the agent extracts from papers?

Everything is cited back to source, so nothing has to be taken on faith. The agent reads papers, trial data and internal reports and extracts the structured data you need with the citation attached.

Does this replace our scientists reviewing regulatory documents?

No. Drafts of regulatory submissions and reports are assembled from your existing data and templates, ready for a scientist to review rather than compile from a blank page, but the review still happens.

How does this catch problems in lab or trial data?

Lab notebook entries, trial logs and QA records are structured and reconciled automatically, catching gaps before they become a finding rather than after.

What is the first thing you would build for a research team?

Usually literature and data extraction or internal knowledge access, since asking across your own protocols, past studies and reports in plain English is a fast, low risk starting point.

Interested in solving your problems with life sciences?

Tell us what you are trying to do and we will reply with how we would build it, no obligation.

Literature review and documentation that used to take weeks off a research timeline runs in the background, cited and ready for review, so your scientists spend their time on the science.

Let’s talk